Burkina Faso’s National Adaptation Plan: A Long-Term Planning Effort

Countries
Source
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), World Resources Institute (WRI)
Climate Objective
Adaptation
Planning and Implementation Activity
Developing Strategies and Plans
Developing and Implementing Policies and Measures
Linking with the Sustainable Development Goals
Monitoring and Evaluation
National Adaptation Plans
Sectors and Themes
Agriculture
Gender
Health
Water
Nature-based Solutions and Ecosystem Services
Forestry and Other Land Use
Language
English
French
Region
Sub-Saharan Africa
Country Grouping
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
Barriers Overcome
Capacity
Institutional
Case Summary

In 2012, Burkina Faso launched a comprehensive effort to develop a National Adaptation Plan (NAP). This case study explores Burkina Faso’s national process to formulate a medium- and long-term strategy for climate change adaptation, which in turn enabled the development of climate projections for Burkina Faso for 2021, 2050, and 2100, as well as the assessment of different sectors’ vulnerability to climate change. It made Burkina Faso one of the first five Least Developed Countries (LDCs) to have a NAP.

The formation of Burkina Faso’s NAP is a good practice because it is an appropriate framework enabling the joining of efforts to help the country reduce its structural vulnerability, increase its resilience, and better manage its socioeconomic and cultural development. It was developed through a consultative process mobilizing actors at different levels and is based on sectoral plans developed from analyses performed with actors from each sector. The vision held by the NAP also has a merit of seeking to promote the integration of climate change adaptation into development goals.

Key findings from the case study include:

  • The participative and inclusive nature of the process helped ensure the relevance of adaptation strategies in different sectors.
  • The monitoring and evaluation mechanism must be made effective by setting up data collection systems through agreements between institutions.
  • Adaptation must not be approached in an isolated manner but should always be intersectoral.
  • A greater availability of financial resources for the implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of NAPs, as well as their development, will be essential.

Further Information

Case study author(s)

Rigobert Bayala, National Observatory for the Environment and Sustainable Development (Burkina Faso)

Year Published
2019